TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of ultrasound in needle placement in intercostal muscles
T2 - A method for increased accuracy in cadavers
AU - Retrouvey, Michele
AU - Chiodo, Tony
AU - Quidley-Nevares, Anton
AU - Strand, Jonathan
AU - Goodmurphy, Craig
PY - 2013/7
Y1 - 2013/7
N2 - Objective: To validate the use of ultrasound technology for the positioning and leveling of intercostal needle placement. Design: Double-blinded experimental study. Setting: An anatomy laboratory. Participants: Two board-certified physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians, 2 first-year medical students, 1 anatomist, and 8 cadavers. Interventions: Four unfixed cadavers were used for unguided needle placement, and 3 unfixed and 1 partially fixed cadavers were used for ultrasound-guided needle placement. Ultrasound-guided needle placement was then confirmed with computed tomography and blind dissection. Main Outcome Measure: The accuracy of needle placement. Results: The unguided study showed needle placement in an intercostal muscle 89% of the time, but in only 15.4% of the time was the correct level sampled. In the 96 needle placements completed, the unguided needle placements had an accuracy of 8.3%, while ultrasound-guided needle placements had an accuracy of 93% (χ2 with P<.005). Conclusions: Ultrasound guidance dramatically increases needle placement accuracy for intercostal nerve blocks and intercostal muscle sampling for electromyography.
AB - Objective: To validate the use of ultrasound technology for the positioning and leveling of intercostal needle placement. Design: Double-blinded experimental study. Setting: An anatomy laboratory. Participants: Two board-certified physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians, 2 first-year medical students, 1 anatomist, and 8 cadavers. Interventions: Four unfixed cadavers were used for unguided needle placement, and 3 unfixed and 1 partially fixed cadavers were used for ultrasound-guided needle placement. Ultrasound-guided needle placement was then confirmed with computed tomography and blind dissection. Main Outcome Measure: The accuracy of needle placement. Results: The unguided study showed needle placement in an intercostal muscle 89% of the time, but in only 15.4% of the time was the correct level sampled. In the 96 needle placements completed, the unguided needle placements had an accuracy of 8.3%, while ultrasound-guided needle placements had an accuracy of 93% (χ2 with P<.005). Conclusions: Ultrasound guidance dramatically increases needle placement accuracy for intercostal nerve blocks and intercostal muscle sampling for electromyography.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879500393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879500393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.026
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 23402723
AN - SCOPUS:84879500393
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 94
SP - 1256
EP - 1259
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 7
ER -