Abstract
Purpose: Little is known about the usefulness and safety of vascular closure devices (VCDs) in electrophysiological procedures. We present a retrospective analysis of our experience assessing the utility and outcomes of collagen vascular closure device (Angioseal) in patients that required periprocedural anticoagulation and multiple vascular access sites. Methods: An retrospective chart review of patients who have undergone the deployment of VCD following electrophysiological procedures. Results: In 26 patients (16 males, age 57 ± 15 years, weight 96 ± 21 kg), a total of 76 VCD were deployed. Seventy-three VCDs in femoral veins (right or left) and three in femoral artery. The mean number of VCD per patient was 3 (range, 2–4). VCD was successfully deployed in 75 out of 76 access sites. One patient was noted to have ecchymosis in both groins during follow-up visit. No other complications were noted. Conclusions: We provide evidence that a collagen plug-based VCD designed for arterial closure can be safely and effectively used to close multiple venous accesses even in the same vein. This can be accomplished with a venotomy size up to 2 Fr larger than the size of the closure device.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 193-195 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 2015 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Physiology (medical)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Use of vascular closure device is safe and effective in electrophysiological procedures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver