TY - JOUR
T1 - Using an adoption design to test genetically based differences in risk for child behavior problems in response to home environmental influences
AU - Cree, Robyn A.
AU - Liu, Chang
AU - Gueorguieva, Ralitza
AU - Neiderhiser, Jenae M.
AU - Leve, Leslie D.
AU - Connell, Christian M.
AU - Shaw, Daniel S.
AU - Natsuaki, Misaki N.
AU - Ganiban, Jody M.
AU - Beekman, Charles
AU - Smith, Megan V.
AU - Reiss, David
N1 - Funding Information:
Work on this study was supported by a training grant to the first author from the National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH014235; PI: Heping Zhang PhD) and the Yale School of Public Health. This project was supported by grant R01 HD042608 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, U.S. PHS (PI years 1-5: David Reiss MD; PI years 6-10: Leslie Leve PhD), grant R01 DA020585 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute of Mental Health and OBSSR, NIH, U.S. PHS (PI: Jenae Neiderhiser PhD), grant R01 MH092118 from the National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, U.S. PHS (PIs: Jenae Neiderhiser PhD and Leslie Leve PhD) and grant UH3 OD023389 from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health (PIs: Leslie Leve PhD, Jenae Neiderhiser PhD, and Jody Ganiban PhD). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health (NIH). We extend special thanks to the families and children who participated in this study. We would also like to thank Sally Guyer and the EGDS staff and researchers whose work helped make this study possible.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2021/10/6
Y1 - 2021/10/6
N2 - Differential susceptibility theory (DST) posits that individuals differ in their developmental plasticity: some children are highly responsive to both environmental adversity and support, while others are less affected. According to this theory, plasticity genes that confer risk for psychopathology in adverse environments may promote superior functioning in supportive environments. We tested DST using a broad measure of child genetic liability (based on birth parent psychopathology), adoptive home environmental variables (e.g., marital warmth, parenting stress, and internalizing symptoms), and measures of child externalizing problems (n = 337) and social competence (n = 330) in 54-month-old adopted children from the Early Growth and Development Study. This adoption design is useful for examining DST because children are placed at birth or shortly thereafter with nongenetically related adoptive parents, naturally disentangling heritable and postnatal environmental effects. We conducted a series of multivariable regression analyses that included Gene × Environment interaction terms and found little evidence of DST; rather, interactions varied depending on the environmental factor of interest, in both significance and shape. Our mixed findings suggest further investigation of DST is warranted before tailoring screening and intervention recommendations to children based on their genetic liability or sensitivity.
AB - Differential susceptibility theory (DST) posits that individuals differ in their developmental plasticity: some children are highly responsive to both environmental adversity and support, while others are less affected. According to this theory, plasticity genes that confer risk for psychopathology in adverse environments may promote superior functioning in supportive environments. We tested DST using a broad measure of child genetic liability (based on birth parent psychopathology), adoptive home environmental variables (e.g., marital warmth, parenting stress, and internalizing symptoms), and measures of child externalizing problems (n = 337) and social competence (n = 330) in 54-month-old adopted children from the Early Growth and Development Study. This adoption design is useful for examining DST because children are placed at birth or shortly thereafter with nongenetically related adoptive parents, naturally disentangling heritable and postnatal environmental effects. We conducted a series of multivariable regression analyses that included Gene × Environment interaction terms and found little evidence of DST; rather, interactions varied depending on the environmental factor of interest, in both significance and shape. Our mixed findings suggest further investigation of DST is warranted before tailoring screening and intervention recommendations to children based on their genetic liability or sensitivity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091711729&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091711729&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0954579420000450
DO - 10.1017/S0954579420000450
M3 - Article
C2 - 32654671
AN - SCOPUS:85091711729
SN - 0954-5794
VL - 33
SP - 1229
EP - 1247
JO - Development and Psychopathology
JF - Development and Psychopathology
IS - 4
ER -