TY - JOUR
T1 - Using Mobile-Technology-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Methods with Youth
T2 - A Systematic Review and Recommendations
AU - Heron, Kristin E.
AU - Everhart, Robin S.
AU - McHale, Susan M.
AU - Smyth, Joshua M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].
PY - 2017/11/1
Y1 - 2017/11/1
N2 - Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods are increasingly used in social and health sciences, but the feasibility and best practices for using EMA with youth are not yet clear. We conducted a systematic review of studies that used self-report EMA methods with youth; the goal was to identify common approaches and challenges to implementation and develop recommendations for future research. We examined 54 peer-reviewed papers that reported on 24 unique studies. Papers were evaluated using a standardized, three-dimensional coding scheme focused on the following: (1) sample characteristics; (2) EMA data collection methods (sampling duration, frequency, hardware/software); (3) study implementation methods (technical/logistical challenges, training participants, compliance). Overall, the research suggests EMA can be successfully implemented with youth (age∼ ≥7) from diverse backgrounds, but protocol adaptations may be necessary for younger children. Study design and implementation challenges and recommendations for research on youth are provided.
AB - Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods are increasingly used in social and health sciences, but the feasibility and best practices for using EMA with youth are not yet clear. We conducted a systematic review of studies that used self-report EMA methods with youth; the goal was to identify common approaches and challenges to implementation and develop recommendations for future research. We examined 54 peer-reviewed papers that reported on 24 unique studies. Papers were evaluated using a standardized, three-dimensional coding scheme focused on the following: (1) sample characteristics; (2) EMA data collection methods (sampling duration, frequency, hardware/software); (3) study implementation methods (technical/logistical challenges, training participants, compliance). Overall, the research suggests EMA can be successfully implemented with youth (age∼ ≥7) from diverse backgrounds, but protocol adaptations may be necessary for younger children. Study design and implementation challenges and recommendations for research on youth are provided.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034858030&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034858030&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx078
DO - 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx078
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28475765
AN - SCOPUS:85034858030
SN - 0146-8693
VL - 42
SP - 1087
EP - 1107
JO - Journal of pediatric psychology
JF - Journal of pediatric psychology
IS - 10
ER -