TY - JOUR
T1 - Validity Evidence for a Novel, Comprehensive Bag–Mask Ventilation Assessment Tool
AU - Whalen, Allison M.
AU - Merves, Matthew H.
AU - Kharayat, Priyanka
AU - Barry, James S.
AU - Glass, Kristen M.
AU - Berg, Robert A.
AU - Sawyer, Taylor
AU - Nadkarni, Vinay
AU - Boyer, Donald L.
AU - Nishisaki, Akira
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Objective: To develop a comprehensive competency assessment tool for pediatric bag–mask ventilation (pBMV) and demonstrate multidimensional validity evidence for this tool. Study design: A novel pBMV assessment tool was developed consisting of 3 components: a 22-item-based checklist (trichotomized response), global rating scale (GRS, 5-point), and entrustment assessment (4-point). Participants' performance in a realistic simulation scenario was video-recorded and assessed by blinded raters. Multidimensional validity evidence for procedural assessment, including evidence for content, response-process, internal structure, and relation to other variables, was assessed. The scores of each scale were compared with training level. Item-based checklist scores also were correlated with GRS and entrustment scores. Results: Fifty-eight participants (9 medical students, 10 pediatric residents, 18 critical care/neonatology fellows, 21 critical care/neonatology attendings) were evaluated. The pBMV tool was supported by high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.867). Inter-rater reliability for the item-based checklist component was acceptable (r = 0.65, P < .0001). The item-based checklist scores differentiated between medical students and other providers (P < .0001), but not by other trainee level. GRS and entrustment scores significantly differentiated between training levels (P < .001). Correlation between skill item-based checklist and GRS was r = 0.489 (P = .0001) and between item-based checklist and entrustment score was r = 0.52 (P < .001). This moderate correlation suggested each component measures pBMV skills differently. The GRS and entrustment scores demonstrated moderate inter-rater reliability (0.42 and 0.46). Conclusions: We established evidence of multidimensional validity for a novel entrustment-based pBMV competence assessment tool, incorporating global and entrustment-based assessments. This comprehensive tool can provide learner feedback and aid in entrustment decisions as learners progress through training.
AB - Objective: To develop a comprehensive competency assessment tool for pediatric bag–mask ventilation (pBMV) and demonstrate multidimensional validity evidence for this tool. Study design: A novel pBMV assessment tool was developed consisting of 3 components: a 22-item-based checklist (trichotomized response), global rating scale (GRS, 5-point), and entrustment assessment (4-point). Participants' performance in a realistic simulation scenario was video-recorded and assessed by blinded raters. Multidimensional validity evidence for procedural assessment, including evidence for content, response-process, internal structure, and relation to other variables, was assessed. The scores of each scale were compared with training level. Item-based checklist scores also were correlated with GRS and entrustment scores. Results: Fifty-eight participants (9 medical students, 10 pediatric residents, 18 critical care/neonatology fellows, 21 critical care/neonatology attendings) were evaluated. The pBMV tool was supported by high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.867). Inter-rater reliability for the item-based checklist component was acceptable (r = 0.65, P < .0001). The item-based checklist scores differentiated between medical students and other providers (P < .0001), but not by other trainee level. GRS and entrustment scores significantly differentiated between training levels (P < .001). Correlation between skill item-based checklist and GRS was r = 0.489 (P = .0001) and between item-based checklist and entrustment score was r = 0.52 (P < .001). This moderate correlation suggested each component measures pBMV skills differently. The GRS and entrustment scores demonstrated moderate inter-rater reliability (0.42 and 0.46). Conclusions: We established evidence of multidimensional validity for a novel entrustment-based pBMV competence assessment tool, incorporating global and entrustment-based assessments. This comprehensive tool can provide learner feedback and aid in entrustment decisions as learners progress through training.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126340161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126340161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.02.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.02.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 35181294
AN - SCOPUS:85126340161
SN - 0022-3476
VL - 245
SP - 165-171.e13
JO - Journal of Pediatrics
JF - Journal of Pediatrics
ER -