Abstract
We show that splitting an award can result in lower expected procurement costs, even in a one-time procurement setting, as long as entering the bidding competition is costly. For sufficiently risk-averse bidders, the split award mechanism provides additional insurance against the possiblity of losing the bid and, therefore, any bidding costs. This result contrasts with previous theoretical works which focus on one-time procurement and have concluded that multiple sourcing increases expected procurement costs.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 295-310 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Group Decision and Negotiation |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 1995 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Decision Sciences
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- General Social Sciences
- Strategy and Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation