TY - JOUR
T1 - Variation across police response models for handling encounters with people with mental illnesses
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Seo, Chunghyeon
AU - Kim, Bitna
AU - Kruis, Nathan E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to synthesize previous empirical research that examined the outcomes of police response models (PRMs) for handling people with mental illness (PWMI). Methods: The current study utilized a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess outcomes of all PRMs documented in the available scholarly literature. Results: Findings from the meta-analysis revealed that the three main types of PRMs noted in the scholarly literature (e.g., the CIT, co-response models, and other models with reduced training hours) were effective in improving “self-reported changes in officer perception” or “self-reported changes in PWMI perception” outcomes (e.g., attitudes toward PWMI and perceived procedural justice of PWMI) related to police encounters with the mentally ill. However, the PRMs seemed to have little impact on official, “observed officer behavior” outcomes, including reducing arrests and excessive use-of-force. Conclusions: PRMs offer a moderately effective solution for processing incidents with PWMI, although the effects of PRMs are different depending on the model implemented and the outcome measures considered.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to synthesize previous empirical research that examined the outcomes of police response models (PRMs) for handling people with mental illness (PWMI). Methods: The current study utilized a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess outcomes of all PRMs documented in the available scholarly literature. Results: Findings from the meta-analysis revealed that the three main types of PRMs noted in the scholarly literature (e.g., the CIT, co-response models, and other models with reduced training hours) were effective in improving “self-reported changes in officer perception” or “self-reported changes in PWMI perception” outcomes (e.g., attitudes toward PWMI and perceived procedural justice of PWMI) related to police encounters with the mentally ill. However, the PRMs seemed to have little impact on official, “observed officer behavior” outcomes, including reducing arrests and excessive use-of-force. Conclusions: PRMs offer a moderately effective solution for processing incidents with PWMI, although the effects of PRMs are different depending on the model implemented and the outcome measures considered.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092486689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092486689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101752
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101752
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85092486689
SN - 0047-2352
VL - 72
JO - Journal of Criminal Justice
JF - Journal of Criminal Justice
M1 - 101752
ER -