TY - JOUR
T1 - Variations in Screening Practices for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infections Among Birthing Hospitals in the United States
AU - Khaki, Sheevaun
AU - Binder, Eli
AU - Cicco, Robert
AU - Hand, Ivan
AU - Hecht, Julia
AU - Iwamoto, Lynn
AU - Kessel, Julie
AU - Vohr, Betty
AU - Sekhar, Deepa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2025.
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - Objective: Evaluate screening practices for congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV), the most common infectious cause of childhood deafness, in American birthing hospitals. Study Design: A survey was developed and distributed to hospitals across the US including the Northeast, Midwest, West, and Southwest between November–December 2023 to understand cCMV screening practices. Summary data were calculated. Hospital characteristics associated with screening were analyzed using a logistic regression model. Hospital practice was reported as a function of legislative mandate. Results: 134 responses were received (28.5% response rate). 78 respondents (58.2%) indicated their hospital screens for cCMV. Common screening indications were newborn hearing screen referral (67.5%) and symptoms that could be attributed to cCMV (57.1%). Odds ratio of cCMV screening for states with screening legislation versus without was 18.0 (p < 0.001). Odds ratio of cCMV screening for urban, level 3 facilities versus rural, level 1 facilities was 6.7 (p < 0.02). Conclusion: Wide variability exists in cCMV screening practices. Legislative screening mandates are associated with higher screening rates. Opportunity exists for development of screening guidelines for newborns at risk for cCMV infection.
AB - Objective: Evaluate screening practices for congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV), the most common infectious cause of childhood deafness, in American birthing hospitals. Study Design: A survey was developed and distributed to hospitals across the US including the Northeast, Midwest, West, and Southwest between November–December 2023 to understand cCMV screening practices. Summary data were calculated. Hospital characteristics associated with screening were analyzed using a logistic regression model. Hospital practice was reported as a function of legislative mandate. Results: 134 responses were received (28.5% response rate). 78 respondents (58.2%) indicated their hospital screens for cCMV. Common screening indications were newborn hearing screen referral (67.5%) and symptoms that could be attributed to cCMV (57.1%). Odds ratio of cCMV screening for states with screening legislation versus without was 18.0 (p < 0.001). Odds ratio of cCMV screening for urban, level 3 facilities versus rural, level 1 facilities was 6.7 (p < 0.02). Conclusion: Wide variability exists in cCMV screening practices. Legislative screening mandates are associated with higher screening rates. Opportunity exists for development of screening guidelines for newborns at risk for cCMV infection.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018488795
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018488795#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s10995-025-04175-7
DO - 10.1007/s10995-025-04175-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 41060607
AN - SCOPUS:105018488795
SN - 1092-7875
VL - 29
SP - 1575
EP - 1582
JO - Maternal and child health journal
JF - Maternal and child health journal
IS - 11
ER -