TY - JOUR
T1 - Ventilatory support in children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome
T2 - Proceedings from the pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference
AU - for the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group
AU - Rimensberger, Peter C.
AU - Cheifetz, Ira M.
AU - Jouvet, Philippe
AU - Thomas, Neal J.
AU - Willson, Douglas F.
AU - Erickson, Simon
AU - Khemani, Robinder
AU - Smith, Lincoln
AU - Zimmerman, Jerry
AU - Dahmer, Mary
AU - Flori, Heidi
AU - Quasney, Michael
AU - Sapru, Anil
AU - Kneyber, Martin
AU - Tamburro, Robert F.
AU - Curley, Martha A.Q.
AU - Nadkarni, Vinay
AU - Valentine, Stacey
AU - Emeriaud, Guillaume
AU - Newth, Christopher
AU - Carroll, Christopher L.
AU - Essouri, Sandrine
AU - Dalton, Heidi
AU - Macrae, Duncan
AU - Lopez, Yolanda
AU - Santschi, Miriam
AU - Watson, R. Scott
AU - Bembea, Melania
PY - 2015/6
Y1 - 2015/6
N2 - Objective: To describe the recommendations of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference for mechanical ventilation management of pediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Design: Consensus Conference of experts in pediatric acute lung injury. Methods: The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference experts developed and voted on a total of 27 recommendations focused on the optimal mechanical ventilation approach of the patient with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Topics included ventilator mode, tidal volume delivery, inspiratory plateau pressure, high-frequency ventilation, cuffed endotracheal tubes, and gas exchange goals. When experimental data were lacking, a modified Delphi approach emphasizing the strong professional agreement was used. Results: There were 17 recommendations with strong agreement and 10 recommendations with weak agreement. There were no recommendations with equipoise or disagreement. There was weak agreement on recommendations concerning approach to tidal volume and inspiratory pressure limitation (88% to 72% agreement, respectively), whereas strong agreement could be achieved for accepting permissive hypercapnia. Using positive end-expiratory pressure levels greater than 15 cm H2O in severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome, under the condition that the markers of oxygen delivery, respiratory system compliance, and hemodynamics are closely monitored as positive end-expiratory pressure is increased, is strongly recommended. The concept of exploring the effects of careful recruitment maneuvers during conventional ventilation met an agreement level of 88%, whereas the use of recruitment maneuvers during rescue high- frequency oscillatory ventilation is highly recommended (strong agreement). Conclusions: The Consensus Conference developed pediatricspecific recommendations regarding mechanical ventilation of the patient with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome as well as future research priorities. These recommendations are intended to initiate discussion regarding optimal mechanical ventilation management for children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome and identify areas of controversy requiring further investigation. (Pediatr Crit Care Med 2015; 16:S51-S60).
AB - Objective: To describe the recommendations of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference for mechanical ventilation management of pediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Design: Consensus Conference of experts in pediatric acute lung injury. Methods: The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference experts developed and voted on a total of 27 recommendations focused on the optimal mechanical ventilation approach of the patient with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Topics included ventilator mode, tidal volume delivery, inspiratory plateau pressure, high-frequency ventilation, cuffed endotracheal tubes, and gas exchange goals. When experimental data were lacking, a modified Delphi approach emphasizing the strong professional agreement was used. Results: There were 17 recommendations with strong agreement and 10 recommendations with weak agreement. There were no recommendations with equipoise or disagreement. There was weak agreement on recommendations concerning approach to tidal volume and inspiratory pressure limitation (88% to 72% agreement, respectively), whereas strong agreement could be achieved for accepting permissive hypercapnia. Using positive end-expiratory pressure levels greater than 15 cm H2O in severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome, under the condition that the markers of oxygen delivery, respiratory system compliance, and hemodynamics are closely monitored as positive end-expiratory pressure is increased, is strongly recommended. The concept of exploring the effects of careful recruitment maneuvers during conventional ventilation met an agreement level of 88%, whereas the use of recruitment maneuvers during rescue high- frequency oscillatory ventilation is highly recommended (strong agreement). Conclusions: The Consensus Conference developed pediatricspecific recommendations regarding mechanical ventilation of the patient with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome as well as future research priorities. These recommendations are intended to initiate discussion regarding optimal mechanical ventilation management for children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome and identify areas of controversy requiring further investigation. (Pediatr Crit Care Med 2015; 16:S51-S60).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952715149&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952715149&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000433
DO - 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000433
M3 - Article
C2 - 26035364
AN - SCOPUS:84952715149
SN - 1529-7535
VL - 16
SP - S51-S60
JO - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
JF - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
IS - 5
ER -