TY - JOUR
T1 - Verbal Person Centeredness in Interaction
T2 - Connecting Micro- and Macro-Level Operationalization
AU - MacGeorge, Erina L.
AU - Branch, Sara E.
AU - Carlson-Hill, Cassandra L.
AU - Tian, Xi
AU - Caldes, Emily P.
AU - Miskovsky, Megan N.
AU - Beatty, Shannon
AU - Brinker, David L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - Verbal person centeredness (VPC) is a long-dominant conceptualization of quality in supportive communication, but prior work provides limited guidance for researchers seeking to examine its impact in interaction. This study examined the extent to which overall VPC for an interaction is predicted by support providers’ specific behaviors. In a laboratory setting, pairs of friends (320 dyads) discussed a problem that one of them was currently experiencing. Transcripts of these interactions were coded by separate research teams for overall VPC of support provision and for the topic, function, and experiential focus of each discrete thought-unit produced by the support provider. Regression analyses showed that VPC was predicted by units representing specific, theoretically interpretable combinations of topical, functional, and experiential focus. The findings provide evidence of validity for procedures used to code VPC for supportive interactions while also displaying ways in which person centeredness is accomplished somewhat differently in interaction than in discrete messages.
AB - Verbal person centeredness (VPC) is a long-dominant conceptualization of quality in supportive communication, but prior work provides limited guidance for researchers seeking to examine its impact in interaction. This study examined the extent to which overall VPC for an interaction is predicted by support providers’ specific behaviors. In a laboratory setting, pairs of friends (320 dyads) discussed a problem that one of them was currently experiencing. Transcripts of these interactions were coded by separate research teams for overall VPC of support provision and for the topic, function, and experiential focus of each discrete thought-unit produced by the support provider. Regression analyses showed that VPC was predicted by units representing specific, theoretically interpretable combinations of topical, functional, and experiential focus. The findings provide evidence of validity for procedures used to code VPC for supportive interactions while also displaying ways in which person centeredness is accomplished somewhat differently in interaction than in discrete messages.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058856232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058856232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0261927X18807508
DO - 10.1177/0261927X18807508
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85058856232
SN - 0261-927X
VL - 38
SP - 149
EP - 169
JO - Journal of Language and Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Language and Social Psychology
IS - 2
ER -