Abstract
This chapter describes crime victims' decision to call or not to call the police, which we discuss in terms of the extent to which it is rational, social, and normative. Examining these decisions is especially important as citizens function as the gatekeepers of our system. Victimization is likely to cause distress, anger, fear, and disbelief, meaning that the reporting decision is subject both to biased judgment and to influence from others in the form of information, advice, and normative standards. Although crime seriousness is generally the most important predictor of the reporting decision, factors about the victim and the offender moderate this relationship. Serious crimes against women are often not reported, and although juveniles generally have higher rates of victimization than adults, they have lower rates of reporting. Recent concern about certain hate crimes also indicates low rates of reporting. Future research possibilities and policy implications are also discussed in this chapter..
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Legal Decision-Making |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 69-85 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781009119375 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781009100601 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 29 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Psychology
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Victim decision-making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver