Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates

Sona N. Golder, Laura B. Stephenson, Karine Van Der Straeten, André Blais, Damien Bol, Philipp Harfst, Jean François Laslier

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations


It is a well-established finding that proportional representation (PR) electoral systems are associated with greater legislative representation for women than single member systems. However, the degree to which different types of PR rules affect voting for female candidates has not been fully explored. The existing literature is also hampered by a reliance on cross-national data in which individual vote preferences and electoral system features are endogenous. In this study, we draw upon an experiment conducted during the 2014 European Parliament (EP) elections to isolate the effects of different PR electoral systems. Participants in the experiment were given the opportunity to vote for real EP candidates in three different electoral systems: closed list, open list, and open list with panachage and cumulation. Because voter preferences can be held constant across the three different votes, we can evaluate the extent to which female candidates were more or less advantaged by the electoral system itself. We find that voters, regardless of their gender, support female candidates, and that this support is stronger under open electoral rules.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-131
Number of pages25
JournalPolitics and Gender
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this