Waiting for Godot: response to ‘How dead is dead? Viable but non-culturable versus persister cells’

Sooyeon Song; Thomas K. Wood

doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12951

Waiting for Godot: response to ‘How dead is dead? Viable but non-culturable versus persister cells’

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	246-247
Number of pages	2
Journal	Environmental Microbiology Reports
Volume	13
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12951
State	Published - Jun 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1111/1758-2229.12951

Cite this

@article{b465c2a8b78948ecaa79cb39488606a8,

title = "Waiting for Godot: response to {\textquoteleft}How dead is dead? Viable but non-culturable versus persister cells{\textquoteright}",

author = "Sooyeon Song and Wood, {Thomas K.}",

year = "2021",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1111/1758-2229.12951",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "13",

pages = "246--247",

journal = "Environmental Microbiology Reports",

issn = "1758-2229",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Waiting for Godot

T2 - response to ‘How dead is dead? Viable but non-culturable versus persister cells’

AU - Song, Sooyeon

AU - Wood, Thomas K.

PY - 2021/6

Y1 - 2021/6

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104685407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104685407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1758-2229.12951

DO - 10.1111/1758-2229.12951

M3 - Letter

C2 - 33884772

AN - SCOPUS:85104685407

SN - 1758-2229

VL - 13

SP - 246

EP - 247

JO - Environmental Microbiology Reports

JF - Environmental Microbiology Reports

IS - 3

ER -

Waiting for Godot: response to ‘How dead is dead? Viable but non-culturable versus persister cells’

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this