TY - JOUR
T1 - Wavelet-Based Moment-Matching Techniques for Inertial Sensor Calibration
AU - Guerrier, Stephane
AU - Jurado, Juan
AU - Khaghani, Mehran
AU - Bakalli, Gaetan
AU - Karemera, Mucyo
AU - Molinari, Roberto
AU - Orso, Samuel
AU - Raquet, John
AU - Schubert, Christine
AU - Skaloud, Jan
AU - Xu, Haotian
AU - Zhang, Yuming
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received November 27, 2019; revised February 7, 2020; accepted March 12, 2020. Date of publication April 8, 2020; date of current version September 15, 2020. This work was supported in part by the SNSF Professorships under Grant 176843, in part by the Innosuisse-Boomerang under Grant 37308.1 IP-ENG, in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant SES-1534433 and Grant SES-1853209, in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences/National Institute of Health (NCATS-NIH) under Grant UL1 TR002014, and in part by U.S. Air Force. The Associate Editor coordinating the review process was Vedran Bilas. (Stéphane Guerrier, Juan Jurado, and Mehran Khaghani are contributed equally to this work.) (Corresponding author: Stéphane Guerrier.) Stéphane Guerrier, Gaetan Bakalli, Mucyo Karemera, Samuel Orso, Haotian Xu, and Yuming Zhang are with the Faculty of Science, Geneva School of Economics and Management, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]).
Publisher Copyright:
© 1963-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - The task of inertial sensor calibration has required the development of various techniques to take into account the sources of measurement error coming from such devices. The calibration of the stochastic errors of these sensors has been the focus of increasing amount of research in which the method of reference has been the so-called 'Allan variance (AV) slope method' which, in addition to not having appropriate statistical properties, requires a subjective input which makes it prone to mistakes. To overcome this, recent research has started proposing 'automatic' approaches where the parameters of the probabilistic models underlying the error signals are estimated by matching functions of the AV or wavelet variance with their model-implied counterparts. However, given the increased use of such techniques, there has been no study or clear direction for practitioners on which approach is optimal for the purpose of sensor calibration. This article, for the first time, formally defines the class of estimators based on this technique and puts forward theoretical and applied results that, comparing with estimators in this class, suggest the use of the Generalized method of Wavelet moments (GMWM) as an optimal choice. In addition to analytical proofs, experiment-driven Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated the superior performance of this estimator. Further analysis of the error signal from a gyroscope was also provided to further motivate performing such analyses, as real-world observed error signals may show significant deviation from manufacturer-provided error models.
AB - The task of inertial sensor calibration has required the development of various techniques to take into account the sources of measurement error coming from such devices. The calibration of the stochastic errors of these sensors has been the focus of increasing amount of research in which the method of reference has been the so-called 'Allan variance (AV) slope method' which, in addition to not having appropriate statistical properties, requires a subjective input which makes it prone to mistakes. To overcome this, recent research has started proposing 'automatic' approaches where the parameters of the probabilistic models underlying the error signals are estimated by matching functions of the AV or wavelet variance with their model-implied counterparts. However, given the increased use of such techniques, there has been no study or clear direction for practitioners on which approach is optimal for the purpose of sensor calibration. This article, for the first time, formally defines the class of estimators based on this technique and puts forward theoretical and applied results that, comparing with estimators in this class, suggest the use of the Generalized method of Wavelet moments (GMWM) as an optimal choice. In addition to analytical proofs, experiment-driven Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated the superior performance of this estimator. Further analysis of the error signal from a gyroscope was also provided to further motivate performing such analyses, as real-world observed error signals may show significant deviation from manufacturer-provided error models.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091862875&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091862875&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TIM.2020.2984820
DO - 10.1109/TIM.2020.2984820
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85091862875
SN - 0018-9456
VL - 69
SP - 7542
EP - 7551
JO - IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
JF - IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
IS - 10
M1 - 9061147
ER -