TY - JOUR
T1 - “We Can’t Provide Season Tickets to the Opera”
T2 - Staff Perceptions of Providing Preference-Based, Person-Centered Care
AU - Abbott, Katherine M.
AU - Heid, Allison R.
AU - van Haitsma, Kimberly
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2016/5/26
Y1 - 2016/5/26
N2 - Knowledge of a nursing home resident’s everyday living preferences provides the foundation for ongoing individualized care planning. Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify nursing home (NH) staff perceptions of facilitators and barriers to learning about and meeting residents’ preferences and reasons why staff feel residents change their minds about preferences. Methods: Focus group sessions and interviews were conducted with 36 NH staff members working in a facility that has been actively assessing resident preferences for five years. Results: Thematic codes classifying facilitators, barriers, and dependencies were identified. Staff shared ways they are able to help meet residents’ preferences as well as barriers to fulfilling resident preferences through their own behaviors, facility characteristics, the social environment, and resident characteristics. In addition, staff believe that residents change their minds about important preferences ‘depending on’ several factors including; global environmental characteristics, social environment, resident characteristics, and general staff perceptions. Conclusions: This work identifies key facilitators and barriers to consider when implementing quality improvement efforts designed to improve the person-centered nature of care in nursing homes and is intended to further inform the culture change movement, which aims to transform NHs by empowering staff and delivering person-centered care.
AB - Knowledge of a nursing home resident’s everyday living preferences provides the foundation for ongoing individualized care planning. Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify nursing home (NH) staff perceptions of facilitators and barriers to learning about and meeting residents’ preferences and reasons why staff feel residents change their minds about preferences. Methods: Focus group sessions and interviews were conducted with 36 NH staff members working in a facility that has been actively assessing resident preferences for five years. Results: Thematic codes classifying facilitators, barriers, and dependencies were identified. Staff shared ways they are able to help meet residents’ preferences as well as barriers to fulfilling resident preferences through their own behaviors, facility characteristics, the social environment, and resident characteristics. In addition, staff believe that residents change their minds about important preferences ‘depending on’ several factors including; global environmental characteristics, social environment, resident characteristics, and general staff perceptions. Conclusions: This work identifies key facilitators and barriers to consider when implementing quality improvement efforts designed to improve the person-centered nature of care in nursing homes and is intended to further inform the culture change movement, which aims to transform NHs by empowering staff and delivering person-centered care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961207781&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961207781&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07317115.2016.1151968
DO - 10.1080/07317115.2016.1151968
M3 - Article
C2 - 27134341
AN - SCOPUS:84961207781
SN - 0731-7115
VL - 39
SP - 190
EP - 209
JO - Clinical Gerontologist
JF - Clinical Gerontologist
IS - 3
ER -