TY - JOUR
T1 - Weighing stars from birth to death
T2 - mass determination methods across the HRD
AU - Serenelli, Aldo
AU - Weiss, Achim
AU - Aerts, Conny
AU - Angelou, George C.
AU - Baroch, David
AU - Bastian, Nate
AU - Beck, Paul G.
AU - Bergemann, Maria
AU - Bestenlehner, Joachim M.
AU - Czekala, Ian
AU - Elias-Rosa, Nancy
AU - Escorza, Ana
AU - Van Eylen, Vincent
AU - Feuillet, Diane K.
AU - Gandolfi, Davide
AU - Gieles, Mark
AU - Girardi, Léo
AU - Lebreton, Yveline
AU - Lodieu, Nicolas
AU - Martig, Marie
AU - Miller Bertolami, Marcelo M.
AU - Mombarg, Joey S.G.
AU - Morales, Juan Carlos
AU - Moya, Andrés
AU - Nsamba, Benard
AU - Pavlovski, Krešimir
AU - Pedersen, May G.
AU - Ribas, Ignasi
AU - Schneider, Fabian R.N.
AU - Silva Aguirre, Victor
AU - Stassun, Keivan G.
AU - Tolstoy, Eline
AU - Tremblay, Pier Emmanuel
AU - Zwintz, Konstanze
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - The mass of a star is the most fundamental parameter for its structure, evolution, and final fate. It is particularly important for any kind of stellar archaeology and characterization of exoplanets. There exist a variety of methods in astronomy to estimate or determine it. In this review we present a significant number of such methods, beginning with the most direct and model-independent approach using detached eclipsing binaries. We then move to more indirect and model-dependent methods, such as the quite commonly used isochrone or stellar track fitting. The arrival of quantitative asteroseismology has opened a completely new approach to determine stellar masses and to complement and improve the accuracy of other methods. We include methods for different evolutionary stages, from the pre-main sequence to evolved (super)giants and final remnants. For all methods uncertainties and restrictions will be discussed. We provide lists of altogether more than 200 benchmark stars with relative mass accuracies between [0.3 , 2] % for the covered mass range of M∈[0.1,16]M⊙, 75 % of which are stars burning hydrogen in their core and the other 25 % covering all other evolved stages. We close with a recommendation how to combine various methods to arrive at a “mass-ladder” for stars.
AB - The mass of a star is the most fundamental parameter for its structure, evolution, and final fate. It is particularly important for any kind of stellar archaeology and characterization of exoplanets. There exist a variety of methods in astronomy to estimate or determine it. In this review we present a significant number of such methods, beginning with the most direct and model-independent approach using detached eclipsing binaries. We then move to more indirect and model-dependent methods, such as the quite commonly used isochrone or stellar track fitting. The arrival of quantitative asteroseismology has opened a completely new approach to determine stellar masses and to complement and improve the accuracy of other methods. We include methods for different evolutionary stages, from the pre-main sequence to evolved (super)giants and final remnants. For all methods uncertainties and restrictions will be discussed. We provide lists of altogether more than 200 benchmark stars with relative mass accuracies between [0.3 , 2] % for the covered mass range of M∈[0.1,16]M⊙, 75 % of which are stars burning hydrogen in their core and the other 25 % covering all other evolved stages. We close with a recommendation how to combine various methods to arrive at a “mass-ladder” for stars.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106966497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106966497&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00159-021-00132-9
DO - 10.1007/s00159-021-00132-9
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85106966497
SN - 0935-4956
VL - 29
JO - Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
JF - Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
IS - 1
M1 - 4
ER -