Abstract
Opt Out Florida, a largely White, middle-class social movement comprised of parents–most often, mothers–opposed to high-stakes standardised testing in U.S. public schools, has received media criticism for its homogeneity. This article elucidates that trend while simultaneously offering a more nuanced view, using theories of internalised dominance, colourblindness, and powerblindness to analyse Opt Out members’ racial story lines and testimonies. These discursive frames underscore the paradox of a White, middle-class movement purportedly acting for social justice aims: to democratically solve the problem of high-stakes testing, Opt Out members must seek out diverse perspectives. Otherwise, they are not just opting out, but missing out.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 199-217 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Whiteness and Education |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2019 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Cultural Studies
- Education
- Demography
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What about race? internalised dominance in the Opt Out Florida movement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver