TY - JOUR
T1 - What Can Sociogenomics Learn from Social By Nature? A review of social by nature, by Catherine Bliss
AU - Daw, Jonathan
AU - Chapman, Alexander
AU - Evans, Megan
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge assistance provided by the Population Research Institute at Penn State University, which is supported by an infrastructure grant by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [P2CHD041025] and Family Demography Training Grant [T32HD007514]. Further support to the authors was provided by a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01DK114888]. We thank Jason D. Boardman and Jeremy Freese for comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Society for Biodemography and Social Biology.
PY - 2018/10/2
Y1 - 2018/10/2
N2 - Social by Nature, the recent book by Catherine Bliss on the development and state of the field of sociogenomics, is far from perfect. Yet, this flawed book levies a mixture of erroneous and compelling questions about the state of the field of sociogenomics, many of which we as a field would benefit from considering: How should we bring the environment back in the post-GWAS era? How do the publication and funding incentives of our field influence the evolution of our research agenda? What role should social scientific theory play in motivating our research and interpreting our findings? How can we promote greater diversity in our research community and subjects? And how can we work to better control media and popular narratives of our research? The authors do not attempt to answer all of these questions definitively, but do argue that we as a field must grapple with them seriously to ensure that our ideals and reality as a field are more congruent.
AB - Social by Nature, the recent book by Catherine Bliss on the development and state of the field of sociogenomics, is far from perfect. Yet, this flawed book levies a mixture of erroneous and compelling questions about the state of the field of sociogenomics, many of which we as a field would benefit from considering: How should we bring the environment back in the post-GWAS era? How do the publication and funding incentives of our field influence the evolution of our research agenda? What role should social scientific theory play in motivating our research and interpreting our findings? How can we promote greater diversity in our research community and subjects? And how can we work to better control media and popular narratives of our research? The authors do not attempt to answer all of these questions definitively, but do argue that we as a field must grapple with them seriously to ensure that our ideals and reality as a field are more congruent.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076772881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076772881&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19485565.2019.1597622
DO - 10.1080/19485565.2019.1597622
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31852334
AN - SCOPUS:85076772881
SN - 1948-5565
VL - 64
SP - 237
EP - 250
JO - Biodemography and Social Biology
JF - Biodemography and Social Biology
IS - 3-4
ER -