Abstract
The large majority of inferences drawn in empirical political research follow from model-based associations (e.g., regression). Here, we articulate the benefits of predictive modeling as a complement to this approach. Predictive models aim to specify a probabilistic model that provides a good fit to testing data that were not used to estimate the model's parameters. Our goals are threefold. First, we reviewthe central benefits of this under-utilized approach from a perspective uncommon in the existing literature:we focus on howpredictive modeling can be used to complement and augment standard associational analyses. Second, we advance the state of the literature by laying out a simple set of benchmark predictive criteria. Third, we illustrate our approach through a detailed application to the prediction of interstate conflict.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 145-166 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Political Analysis |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 1 2017 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations