Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What drives community flood risk management? Policy diffusion or free-riding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study explores whether participation in the US Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Community Rating System (CRS), a voluntary community flood risk management program, is a function of policy diffusion or an act of free-riding. Policy diffusion would suggest that, all else being equal, once a community has joined the CRS, neighboring communities will be more likely to follow their lead and participate in the CRS. Free-riding would imply that neighboring communities might choose not to participate in the CRS because they perceive that their community benefits from surrounding communities’ participation. Results indicate that a community’s decision to participate in the CRS is not influenced by the characteristics of or the behavior of their neighbors. The results of this study do, however, show that population density, aggregate housing values, rentership rate, and flat topography are significant predictors of CRS participation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-80
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What drives community flood risk management? Policy diffusion or free-riding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this