TY - JOUR
T1 - What Is Behavioral Public Administration Good for?
AU - Bertelli, Anthony M.
AU - M. Riccucci, Norma
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by The American Society for Public Administration
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - Abstract: Public administration has seen an influx of work addressing something that has been called “behavioral public administration (BPA)”; A hallmark of BPA is the examination of public administration from a micro-level perspective with attention to the psychological aspects of human behavior. However, scholars of public administration have long applied a micro-level lens to their research, even from a psychological standpoint. We argue here that the call for BPA is mainly an appeal for greater reliance on an analytical lens or research method, namely experimental designs. As argued here, however, little attention has been given to major drawbacks: experiments tend not to be theory driven, they overstate their importance to policy and management, and they fail to capture the significance of politics and institutions. If BPA is to be more than a passing fancy, the limits of experimentation must be reevaluated for public administration.
AB - Abstract: Public administration has seen an influx of work addressing something that has been called “behavioral public administration (BPA)”; A hallmark of BPA is the examination of public administration from a micro-level perspective with attention to the psychological aspects of human behavior. However, scholars of public administration have long applied a micro-level lens to their research, even from a psychological standpoint. We argue here that the call for BPA is mainly an appeal for greater reliance on an analytical lens or research method, namely experimental designs. As argued here, however, little attention has been given to major drawbacks: experiments tend not to be theory driven, they overstate their importance to policy and management, and they fail to capture the significance of politics and institutions. If BPA is to be more than a passing fancy, the limits of experimentation must be reevaluated for public administration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091255467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091255467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/puar.13283
DO - 10.1111/puar.13283
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85091255467
SN - 0033-3352
VL - 82
SP - 179
EP - 183
JO - Public Administration Review
JF - Public Administration Review
IS - 1
ER -