Abstract
The demand-side perspective argues that the drug overdose epidemic is a consequence of changes in the economy that leave behind working-class people who lack a college education. In contrast, the supply-side perspective maintains that the epidemic is primarily due to changes in the licit and illicit drug environment, whereas a third, distinct perspective argues that income inequality is likely a key driver of the epidemic. To evaluate these competing perspectives, we use a two-level random intercept model and U.S. state-level data from 2006 to 2017. Contrary to the demand-side approach, we find that educational attainment is not associated with drug-related mortality. In support of the supply-side approach, we provide evidence indicating that opioid prescription rates are positively associated with drug-related mortality. We also find that income inequality is a key driver of the epidemic, particularly the lack of resources going to the bottom 20% of earners. We conclude by arguing that considerations of income inequality are an important way to link the arguments made by the demand-side and the supply-side perspectives.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 275-289 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of health and social behavior |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2020 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health