Abstract
This study examined how Pennsylvania pediatricians characterized reasonable suspicion of child abuse, using their own words in open-ended queries. Content analysis and an iterative process identified themes, which then served as the dependent variable for analysis. 1,249 pediatricians returned the survey (61% response rate), of whom 1,012 answered the open-ended question (49% response rate). Content analysis identified 4 distinct theme categories and significant correlations with age, gender, frequency of reporting, prior education, and current position, but not expertise with child abuse or board certification. These findings add new, qualitative data to arguments for re-examining the threshold for mandated reporting.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 569-589 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Child Welfare |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What Is Reasonable Suspicion of Child Abuse?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver