Abstract
A number of reports have suggested that patients who undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) may experience changes to their personality or sense of self. These reports have attracted great philosophical interest. This paper surveys the philosophical literature on personal identity and DBS and draws on an emerging empirical literature on the experiences of patients who have undergone this therapy to argue that the existing philosophical discussion of DBS and personal identity frames the problem too narrowly. Much of the discussion by neuroethicists centers on the nature of the threat posed by DBS, asking whether it is best understood as a threat to personal identity, autonomy, agency, or authenticity, or as putting patients at risk of self-estrangement. Our aim in this paper is to use the empirical literature on patients’ experiences post-DBS to open up a broader range of questions - both philosophical and practical, and to suggest that attention to these questions will help to provide better support to patients, both before and after treatment.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 289-301 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Neuroethics |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Philosophy
- Neurology
- Health Policy
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What we (Should) Talk about when we Talk about Deep Brain Stimulation and Personal Identity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver