When inclusion hurts: The role of valence in moderating the effects of being in the loop

Megan K. McCarty, Nicole E. Iannone, Eric E. Jones, Janice R. Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

We explored conditions under which being in the loop may be an undesirable experience. We tested whether information valence moderates the effects of being in versus out of the loop in four studies. In a pilot study, participants imagined positive and negative events and indicated the degree to which they would like to know this information. In Study 1, participants imagined being in or out of the loop on positive or negative information and indicated how they would feel. In Study 2, participants relived an actual experience when they were in or out of the loop on positive or negative information. In Study 3, participants were in or out of the loop on positive or negative information needed for an upcoming task. These studies provide evidence that being in the loop on negative information can be an unenjoyable experience, threatening fundamental needs and increasing negative affect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-108
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume158
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When inclusion hurts: The role of valence in moderating the effects of being in the loop'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this