When is advertising a plastic surgeon’s individual “brand” unethical?

Carly P. Smith, Daniel George

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Advertising a plastic surgery practice on social media is fraught with both practical and ethical challenges. We use an institutional betrayal framework to explore the range of potential harms to patient well-being while also considering the pitfalls of social media activity, especially marketing, for practitioners. We also give consideration to the relative benefits that such online patient-clinician relationships can provide. In our analysis, we draw on specific examples of plastic surgery procedures prominently featured on social media, including the Vampire Facelift ®

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)372-378
Number of pages7
JournalAMA Journal of Ethics
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When is advertising a plastic surgeon’s individual “brand” unethical?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this