Abstract
Recent political developments in the United States raise concerns about the potential return of aggressive interrogation strategies, particularly in the event of another large-scale terror attack on the U.S. mainland. This essay reviews various legal, ethical and policy responses to revelations of torture during the Bush administration. It asks whether they improve the prospect that, in future, human rights will trump torture, not vice versa. The essay argues that physicians could help prevent further abuses–especially given their access, social status and expertise–but that insufficient steps have been taken to empower them to do so.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4-17 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Medicine, Conflict and Survival |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Which will Trump: human rights and professional ethics, or torture redux?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver