Abstract
Full-scale Integrated assessment models (IAMs) allow many components of the global climate change problem to be examined in one framework. The chief advantage of the IAM approach over less complete modelling frameworks is that the socio-economic and environmental consequences of policy choices aimed at abating or adapting to climate change can be evaluated in their totality. However, the highly aggregate functional forms that IAMs currently embed are lacking in sufficient regional and sectoral detail to be totally credible. In this paper, ten reasons why regional studies are needed in support of the development of full-scale IAMs are given. A strategic cyclical scaling exercise involving regional and global integrated modelling frameworks is proposed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 337-356 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Global Environmental Change |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1997 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Global and Planetary Change
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Ecology
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Why regional studies are needed in the development of full-scale integrated assessment modelling of global change processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver