Why "unobservables" cannot save general theory: A reply to mahoney

Alan Sica

doi:10.1353/sof.2005.0020

Why "unobservables" cannot save general theory: A reply to mahoney

Alan Sica

Sociology and Criminology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	491-501
Number of pages	11
Journal	Social Forces
Volume	83
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0020
State	Published - Dec 2004

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

History
Anthropology
Sociology and Political Science

Access to Document

10.1353/sof.2005.0020

Cite this

@article{f419b086e0494ffab8511668b7993fad,

title = "Why {"}unobservables{"} cannot save general theory: A reply to mahoney",

author = "Alan Sica",

year = "2004",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1353/sof.2005.0020",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "83",

pages = "491--501",

journal = "Social Forces",

issn = "0037-7732",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why "unobservables" cannot save general theory

T2 - A reply to mahoney

AU - Sica, Alan

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/13544277080

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/13544277080#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1353/sof.2005.0020

DO - 10.1353/sof.2005.0020

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:13544277080

SN - 0037-7732

VL - 83

SP - 491

EP - 501

JO - Social Forces

JF - Social Forces

IS - 2

ER -

Why "unobservables" cannot save general theory: A reply to mahoney

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this