Worker pay protection: Implications for labor's political spending and voice

Marick F. Masters, Raymond Gibney, J. Zagenczyk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


Labor's participation in politics requires money. Within legal restrictions, unions use compulsory dues to pay for much of their involvement. Such usage has continually raised controversy, leading to a host of U.S. Supreme Court decisions to give nonmember dues-payers the right to object to union political spending. We examine the current legal framework and are the first to report comprehensive data on union political spending financed from dues. We estimate the potential impact of a national "worker paycheck protection" law on labor's political spending. With the potential to reduce money available to finance union involvement in politics, such a law may lessen the ability of labor to have its voice heard by lawmakers, especially in the face of shrinking density in the workforce. The importance of this is demonstrated by the large role unions played in the 2008 congressional and presidential elections. Despite Democratic victories in that historic year, "paycheck protection" is likely to loom large, fueled by efforts to enact the Employee Free Choice Act.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)557-577
Number of pages21
JournalIndustrial Relations
Issue number4
StatePublished - Sep 4 2009

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Industrial relations
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation


Dive into the research topics of 'Worker pay protection: Implications for labor's political spending and voice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this