Works and digital resources in the catalog: Electronic versions of book of urizen, the kelmscott chaucer and robinson crusoe

Ann Copeland

doi:10.1300/J104v33n03_08

Works and digital resources in the catalog: Electronic versions of book of urizen, the kelmscott chaucer and robinson crusoe

Ann Copeland

University Libraries - University Park

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The author addresses issues regarding the cataloging of digital manifestations of works. The problem of how to catalog digitized rare books and electronic texts to facilitate access to works while distinguishing editions is discussed. Using digital versions of Blake’s Book of Urizen, The Kelmscott Chaucer and Robinson Crusoe as examples, the article focuses on the way current cataloging aids or hinders access to works. Specific problems include: the non-uniform use of uniform titles; varying application of the Library of Congress Rule Interpretation (1.11A) concerning electronic reproductions; and the lack of analysis at the work level in digital projects. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-HAWORTH. E-mail address: <getinfo@ haworthpressinc.com> Website: <http://www.HaworthPress.com>

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	161-180
Number of pages	20
Journal	Cataloging and Classification Quarterly
Volume	33
Issue number	3-4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v33n03_08
State	Published - Aug 1 2002

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Library and Information Sciences

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1300/J104v33n03_08

Cite this

@article{6b2beb110c1245379b74dcebe209baba,

title = "Works and digital resources in the catalog: Electronic versions of book of urizen, the kelmscott chaucer and robinson crusoe",

abstract = "The author addresses issues regarding the cataloging of digital manifestations of works. The problem of how to catalog digitized rare books and electronic texts to facilitate access to works while distinguishing editions is discussed. Using digital versions of Blake{\textquoteright}s Book of Urizen, The Kelmscott Chaucer and Robinson Crusoe as examples, the article focuses on the way current cataloging aids or hinders access to works. Specific problems include: the non-uniform use of uniform titles; varying application of the Library of Congress Rule Interpretation (1.11A) concerning electronic reproductions; and the lack of analysis at the work level in digital projects. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-HAWORTH. E-mail address: Website: ",

author = "Ann Copeland",

year = "2002",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1300/J104v33n03_08",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "33",

pages = "161--180",

journal = "Cataloging and Classification Quarterly",

issn = "0163-9374",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Works and digital resources in the catalog

T2 - Electronic versions of book of urizen, the kelmscott chaucer and robinson crusoe

AU - Copeland, Ann

PY - 2002/8/1

Y1 - 2002/8/1

N2 - The author addresses issues regarding the cataloging of digital manifestations of works. The problem of how to catalog digitized rare books and electronic texts to facilitate access to works while distinguishing editions is discussed. Using digital versions of Blake’s Book of Urizen, The Kelmscott Chaucer and Robinson Crusoe as examples, the article focuses on the way current cataloging aids or hinders access to works. Specific problems include: the non-uniform use of uniform titles; varying application of the Library of Congress Rule Interpretation (1.11A) concerning electronic reproductions; and the lack of analysis at the work level in digital projects. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-HAWORTH. E-mail address: Website:

AB - The author addresses issues regarding the cataloging of digital manifestations of works. The problem of how to catalog digitized rare books and electronic texts to facilitate access to works while distinguishing editions is discussed. Using digital versions of Blake’s Book of Urizen, The Kelmscott Chaucer and Robinson Crusoe as examples, the article focuses on the way current cataloging aids or hinders access to works. Specific problems include: the non-uniform use of uniform titles; varying application of the Library of Congress Rule Interpretation (1.11A) concerning electronic reproductions; and the lack of analysis at the work level in digital projects. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-HAWORTH. E-mail address: Website:

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023852416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023852416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J104v33n03_08

DO - 10.1300/J104v33n03_08

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85023852416

SN - 0163-9374

VL - 33

SP - 161

EP - 180

JO - Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

JF - Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

IS - 3-4

ER -

Works and digital resources in the catalog: Electronic versions of book of urizen, the kelmscott chaucer and robinson crusoe

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this