TY - JOUR
T1 - Writing in community
T2 - Relationship building and accountability in knowledge production
AU - Rivera Prince, Jordi Armani
AU - Blackwood, Emily M.
AU - Landrum, Madeleine
AU - Milton, Emily B.P.
AU - Rodgers, Elizabeth L.
AU - Barnes, Monica
AU - Chin, Elizabeth
AU - Craven, Christa
AU - Douglass, Kristina
AU - Figuerero Torres, María José
AU - Gutiérrez, María A.
AU - Herr, Sarah
AU - Hodgetts, Lisa
AU - Maasch, Kirk A.
AU - Quave, Kylie E.
AU - Rutherford, Danilyn
AU - Sandweiss, Daniel H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). American Anthropologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Anthropological Association.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - As anthropology reckons with its past, present, and future, anthropologists increasingly seek to challenge inequities within the discipline and academia more broadly. Anthropology, regardless of subdiscipline, is a social endeavor. Yet research often remains an isolating (though not necessarily solitary) process, even within research teams and in coauthorship contexts. Here, we focus on peer-reviewed publication as the principal manifestation of knowledge production and propose a method for challenging division, hierarchy, power differentials, and adherence to tradition: writing in community. Writing in community is a collaborative form of writing that centers care, abundance, joy, and personal satisfaction over the individuality currently rewarded by the academy. This process engenders consensus, circumvents normative hierarchical research and writing, and promotes relationship building. Here, we experiment by inviting reviewers and editors into our community to collectively contribute to the writing process and reflect on that experience together. Ultimately, we challenge norms for scholarship, (co)authorship, and ways of knowing to offer a more equitable praxis of knowledge production. We propose that writing in community can help anthropologists enact values of multivocality and research transparency.
AB - As anthropology reckons with its past, present, and future, anthropologists increasingly seek to challenge inequities within the discipline and academia more broadly. Anthropology, regardless of subdiscipline, is a social endeavor. Yet research often remains an isolating (though not necessarily solitary) process, even within research teams and in coauthorship contexts. Here, we focus on peer-reviewed publication as the principal manifestation of knowledge production and propose a method for challenging division, hierarchy, power differentials, and adherence to tradition: writing in community. Writing in community is a collaborative form of writing that centers care, abundance, joy, and personal satisfaction over the individuality currently rewarded by the academy. This process engenders consensus, circumvents normative hierarchical research and writing, and promotes relationship building. Here, we experiment by inviting reviewers and editors into our community to collectively contribute to the writing process and reflect on that experience together. Ultimately, we challenge norms for scholarship, (co)authorship, and ways of knowing to offer a more equitable praxis of knowledge production. We propose that writing in community can help anthropologists enact values of multivocality and research transparency.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105003821650
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105003821650&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/aman.28070
DO - 10.1111/aman.28070
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105003821650
SN - 0002-7294
VL - 127
SP - 319
EP - 338
JO - American Anthropologist
JF - American Anthropologist
IS - 2
ER -