TY - JOUR
T1 - Young children's behavioral and neural responses to peer feedback relate to internalizing problems
AU - Morales, Santiago
AU - Vallorani, Alicia
AU - Pérez-Edgar, Koraly
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Despite the importance of peer experiences during early childhood for socioemotional development, few studies have examined how young children process and respond to peer feedback. The current study used an ecologically valid experimental paradigm to study young children's processing of peer social acceptance or rejection. In this paradigm, 118 children (50% boys; Mage = 72.92 months; SD = 9.30; Rangeage = 53.19–98.86 months) sorted pictures of unknown, similar-aged peers into those with whom they wished or did not wish to play. They were later told how these peers sorted them, such that in half of the cases the presumed peer accepted or rejected the participant. When rejected children reported more distress (sadness), they were slower to rate their affective response, and exhibited increased mid-frontal EEG theta power, compared to when accepted. Moreover, we found that children's affective responses and EEG theta power for rejection predicted internalizing problems, especially if they displayed an attention bias to social threat. Our results further validate and illustrate the utility of this paradigm for studying how young children process and respond to peer feedback.
AB - Despite the importance of peer experiences during early childhood for socioemotional development, few studies have examined how young children process and respond to peer feedback. The current study used an ecologically valid experimental paradigm to study young children's processing of peer social acceptance or rejection. In this paradigm, 118 children (50% boys; Mage = 72.92 months; SD = 9.30; Rangeage = 53.19–98.86 months) sorted pictures of unknown, similar-aged peers into those with whom they wished or did not wish to play. They were later told how these peers sorted them, such that in half of the cases the presumed peer accepted or rejected the participant. When rejected children reported more distress (sadness), they were slower to rate their affective response, and exhibited increased mid-frontal EEG theta power, compared to when accepted. Moreover, we found that children's affective responses and EEG theta power for rejection predicted internalizing problems, especially if they displayed an attention bias to social threat. Our results further validate and illustrate the utility of this paradigm for studying how young children process and respond to peer feedback.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058621910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058621910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.12.008
DO - 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.12.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 30579790
AN - SCOPUS:85058621910
SN - 1878-9293
VL - 36
JO - Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
JF - Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
M1 - 100610
ER -